Communication Climates, Responses, and Dynamics

This paper will discuss small teams on a reality shew called There goes the Neighborhood. This tell is intimately a neighborhood that allows a brick wall to gate them in and they mustiness learn to work together, not only when as a family, scarcely as neighbors too. In the inauguration of the game, everything is taken away from them. For example, all of the luxuries much(prenominal)(prenominal) as appliances, televisions, snacks, video games, and childrens toys were all removed. There was no strike for their cars since there was a huge wall around the neighborhood.These teams not only had to learn to become a team, but it would a equal t severally them to deem everything that they have. The game encourages team work, because without teamwork the teams would lose the altercates that atomic number 18 presented to both teams. Even though the challenges are staged, they push the competitors to extreme emotional, physical, and mental states. The challenges are rewarded with pr izes for the winning team. defensive and supportive climates are always deviation to be a break away of communication. With that in mind we look at a certain musical mode and that is certainty vs. provisionalism.The Nelson Family seems to believe that everything should go their way, and were working on the Johnstons as allies to get rid of the wad they did not like. Since the Nelson family did not admire of the Mullinax family because they were lesbian m some former(a)(a)s they wanted them out of the game. This projects certainty because they were very defensive on the subject. The former(a) families showed provisionalism because they were open to the Mullinaxs situation. This began to tear families apart and finally the another(prenominal) families were tired of being followers and kicked the Nelson family off.Later on in the game, the families started to point out that the Mullinax family was just giving excuses every week for why they should not be eliminated. First it was for stereotypes, and then it was for nobody liking them, and this week it was they live paycheck to paycheck and have two children going to college soon. It seemed as though other family members were getting tired of the excuses and felt as if they might be exploitation it to their advantage to win the game, so they eliminated the Mullinaxs. The Mullinaxs started to show defensive look thinking it would save them and people would show sympathy for them, but it seemed to resile on them. The person who behaves defensively, even though he or she also gives some attention to the common task, devotes an appreciable portion of energy to support himself or herself. Besides talking about the topic, he thinks about how he appears to others, how he may be seen much favorably, how he may win, dominate, inculcate or escape punishment, and/or how he may avoid or mitigate a perceived attack. (Gibb, n. d. )This same situation takes place in convinced(p) and disconfirming responses. Dur ing the elimination ceremony, the Mullinax family poured their hearts out stating that the Nelson family made them expression outside of the core. The Nelson family showed disconfirming responses by failing to acknowledge them and talking to other family members while they were talking. This also showed their non vocal behavior such as furled their eyeball and smiling at their family members. Non vocal communication is defined as all the messages that people transmit through means other than speech (Alberts, 2007).The Nelsons would someday see themselves on television and see how a lot they used non-verbal behavior in a negative way. nearlytimes people have to acknowledge someones negative non-verbal behavior in the beginning the main person recognizes it. Other families tuned in and really listened to what the Mullinax family had to say and showed confirming responses. None of the other families knew that was how the Mullinax family felt deep inside and they changed their min ds to eliminate the Nelson family. gluiness relates to the degree to which members are attracted to and motivated to remain part of that team.A cohesive group member values his or her membership and strives to maintain a positive relationship within the group. Often, cohesion is viewed from an affective perspective as interpersonal draw poker among members or to the group. However, cohesion can also be envisioned as attraction to a collectivity as opposed to an attraction to the individuals who make up that grouping. (Ratzburg, n. d. ) It is of import that every single member never work against each other but strive to work with each other toward their shared goal(s). Any negative force that threatens the teams success redirects itself into something ositive as long as team members share the same purpose. Cohesiveness is a process whereby a sense of we-ness emerges to transcend individual differences and motives (Kinicki Kreitner, 2004, p. 15). Some of the teenagers in the famil ies did not approve of how their parents were acting on decision making. Since these people were genuinely neighbors in real life, these teenagers were friends with the other teens in the game. This caused problems because some of the parents were being adolescent and this caused the teens to rebel against their own family.In certain challenges the teens would not try as hard as they should because they disapproved of what their parents were planning. Finally, one of the mothers talked to them and explained that it was only a game and more than anything they needed to work together as a family first. The teen realized that this was more important and strived to help his team out. Effective listening is an important part of working as a team. When printingive listening does not occur it can result in misunderstanding, failed goals and accomplishment, or even a conflict amidst team members.This situation came into place as the teams had their challenges. The teams were hypotheti cal to build a house of card which taught them how to listen to each other and work as a team. One of the children was very experienced in building houses of cards, but the parents were ignoring his ideas on how to build it because of his age. The family ended up losing the challenge because they did not listen to each other. The same thing that the child was explaining to his family, the other team listened and took the idea and won the challenge. This also showed a barrier surrounded by the adults and the children.Some parents still live the old fashion way where children are not really paid attention to, especially in a situation where a huge lump sum of money is involved. Some of the old fashioned quotes would be, Dont speak until youre spoken to Children should be seen and not perceive. Due to this, children never get a chance to express themselves or help out so they either give up or rebel. Some children feel why they should bother if no one is going to pay attention to the m. There were also several barriers between the families such as cultural, physical, and emotional. There were a lot of stereotypes going on in this show.Like mentioned before, the Nelsons had a problem with the Mullinaxs because they were lesbians. The men had issues with Cameron Johnston because he was a stay at home soda pop. They secretly would mention that they did not feel that he should be staying at home while his married woman worked. They figured he was a real man, so they would never include him in the things that they were doing outside of the challenges. There was also the Upshaw family who were a bi-racial family where the mother was ashen and the father was black, and they were definitely nonverbal looks at the beginning at this family.The Upshaw dad felt out of place being the only black man, so he was always staying on his toes and making sure that his family won the challenges so that they would not be sent home. He was one of the families at the beginning that sided with the Nelsons because he knew that they were in charge. He was also the main person who sided with the Mullinaxs and eliminated the Nelsons too. In conclusion, watching reality shows definitely show real team work and the positive and negative outcomes.When watching fictitious sitcoms or series, we really do not get the full effect of how teamwork really works but how the director and writer perceive it. Since this was the pass time it was hard to find a decent reality show to discuss compared to the fall season where there are wonderful shows like Survivor which would have great examples. There goes the neighborhood still showed passable examples on teamwork and interpersonal communication. As the teams were eliminated, the audience could definitely tell which ones substantial learned for the experiment compared to the others who were still defensive.Watching a reality show provided different camera views to catch the families nonverbal and verbal communication. If the y rolled their eyes or whispered something it was all caught on camera with subtitles. Nonverbal and verbal communication work together to convey and explain messages sent between people. Together they support the thoughts and ideas of the speaker. We use nonverbal communication to illustrate the verbal communication. Without one or the other two types of communication we would not be able to fully understand each other.ReferencesAlberts, Jess K. (2007) Human Communication in Society Nonverbal Communication (144-161) Upper Saddle River, New jersey Pearson Prentice Hall Gibb, Jack R.. (n.d.). Defensive Communication. In Definition and Significance. Retrieved common people 13, 2009, from http//www.geocities.com/toritrust/defensive_communication.htm.Kinicki, A., Kreitner, R. (2004). Organizational behavior Teams and Teamwork for the 21st Century. New York The McGraw-Hill Companies.LeVrier, Peggy. (n.d.). Parent University. In Establishing your carry as an effective listener. Retrie ved Sept 13, 2009, from http//www.pasadenaisd.org/parentuniversity/parent9.htm.Ratzburg, Wilf H.. (n.d.). Group Cohesiveness. In Organizational Behavior. Retrieved kinfolk 13, 2009, from http//www.geocities.com/athens/forum/1650/htmlgroups18.html.