Naive Realism Essay

Sensory perception, or how race view subjects in life, helps to define nave realism, meaning that we view the world directly as we turn around it, in cold, concrete tangibility. Meaning, I know I carry seen a bird and not just something created in my mind. Representative realism, on the other hand, believes that the mind formulates imagescrafts themas the mind digests information and then creates the images we see within the bounds of our peripheral space.I will discuss dickens differences between nave realism and substitute realism followed by an sound judgement of substitute realism.First of all, when we view life as a nave realist, we discharge prove with tangible evidenceusing some or all of the six senses that what we perceive is actually on that point. For example, a birthday cover on a table fundament be touched, tasted, felt, and smelled, thereby proving its existence. The representative realist fathoms images seen from an abstract angle. For example, cloud format ions in the sky can be viewed as different objects. Someone says, I see a bears face in the cloud, while someone else may see a butterfly.To go one step further, in nave realism, we say that quantify is distributed into now, which is a real experience, and the past, which did happen but no longer exists, and the future, which is stock-still to occur.Science says we have objective reality, or the here and now. Along with this, there is subjective perception, or two people seeing the same thing differently. Classical science, then, broke away from nave realism and had to consider the representative realists viewpoint. For example, when we think of dreams or watching a video, two people may see things very differently.True, they are there, but where is the distinction-mark drawn to single out what is dreamt and what is real, or how do we separate two different viewpoints of the same movie? This, for a nave realist, is difficult to answer. Sure, we can speculate but it but brings u s closer to falling in line with the representatives methodology. Heres an analogy to help define this The representative realists brain acts as a baker that follows a recipe, using the ingredients in his kitchen to bake a cake.Slight modifications in the amount of an ingredient can alter the flavor, or even the appearance of the cake. A potential award-winning three-layer cake will sink in the oven without sufficient yeast. Thus, the representative realist solves this predicament by believing the brain is the baker cooking up images, whereas the nave realist purely functions on digesting tangible images.Nave realism can be criticized and assessed further. If we regard perception as a case whereby individual experience creates what we see, the floodgate of personal interpretation is opened. Can nave realism drown in these floodgates of alter perceptions? If situations are regarded simply, then the nave realist can consider what he sees.However, life is not a simple cookie-cutte r mold. even off something as simple as a lump of wax seeks varied interpretation when we add a new ingredient, say a candle and a flame. Now the wax takes on new features and varied perceptions. horizontal the same person can visualize the same object in many different ways. Look at a print created by M.C. Escher and you will see how quickly the mind can shift its perceptive view of the same thing.In final assessment of representative realism, it can be seen that it does, in fact, provides a significant and worthwhile advancement in our understanding of humankind experiences. For, living in a world where the psychological makeup of an individual holds such lasting presence, it is difficult to image notwithstanding believing in the nave realists way of thinking. However, just to be fair, nave realism will always have a lieu in human intellectual perception. Its up to the individual to checker how she sees things.SOURCEShttp//www.arrod.co.uk/essays/representative-realism.phphtt p//www.planetpapers.com/Assets/4368.phphttp//spartan.ac.brocku.ca/lward/Dewey/Dewey_1916/Dewey_1916_09.html